Ten European and Japanese engineering groups were hit yesterday with the second-largest penalty yet imposed under European antitrust laws after being convicted of running a cartel to control the manufacture and supply of electricity network equipment.
The European Commission imposed fines of e750.7m (£494.6m) against the worldwide cartel, which began operating in 1988 and lasted until 2004, when commission antitrust officials raided cartel members' offices in May of that year, in the middle of a price-fixing meeting.
The probe focused on the market for gas-insulated high-tension electric switch-gear, used to control flow in electricity grids. Customers included state-owned public utilities, municipalities and private companies.
Siemens, the largest engineering company in Europe, received the biggest fine, e396.6m. Other European firms included Alstom and Schneider Electric. Japan's Fuji Electric Holdings, Hitachi, Mitsubishi Electric and Toshiba were also fined.
Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes has been cracking down on cartels since taking over for Mario Monti in 2004. The commission has fined seven cartels a record e1.84bn in the last year.
Kroes said: "The commission has put an end to a cartel which has cheated public utility companies and consumers for more than 16 years. The commission has once more shown it will not tolerate cartels in Europe and the damage they do in any area of business."
The highest fine imposed by the commission in a cartel case was a record e790.5m for fixing vitamin prices in 2001. The companies have a right to appeal the decision to the European Court of First Instance in Luxembourg.
So far, only Munich-based Siemens has said it would appeal, calling the penalties "completely exaggerated."
ABB, the world's largest builder of electricity networks, tipped off the EU and avoided a e215.2m fine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article