Photo-Me's ex-chief ousts group's chairman

For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails

Sign up to our free breaking news emails

Please enter a valid email address

Please enter a valid email address

SIGN UP

I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy policy

The upheavals at Photo-Me, the beleaguered digital imaging chain, intensified yesterday with the interim chairman forced out of his position by a major shareholder who was himself forced out of the chief executive's job in November.

Shares in the company closed slightly up – but still at a woeful 15.5p – after the announcement that David Young had stepped down, along with two other non-executive directors, and that Hugo Swire, a Conservative MP and non-executive director since June 2005, has been appointed as an interim replacement while a permanent chairman is recruited.

The resignations, which were a result of pressure from Serge Crasnianski and two other unnamed former directors, are the latest in a saga of scalps and profits warnings at Photo-Me as the company struggles to establish a business for itself in a world of ubiquitous digital photography.

Mr Crasnianski retained a 19.8 per cent shareholding when he resigned at the end of last year, along with Vernon Sankey, the company's chairman, after a shareholder revolt, spearheaded by Principle Capital and Cycladic Capital, over plans to sell the firm's photo booth business.

Five years ago the business was valued at more than £500m. But shares that were selling for 90.5p in January last year, have been on a continual slide.

In December, when the firm published half-year financial results showing pre-tax profits down 39 per cent to £7.3m and turnover down 3 per cent to £107.1m, they dropped to just 36p. And earlier this month, the stock lost a quarter of its value in a single day – taking it down to 24.5p – with another warning that the company will make a loss this year, rather than the £4m profit originally predicted.

The on-going problems sparked renewed speculation that the firm's days as a public company are numbered.