Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
premier foods products
A selection products owned by Premier Foods. The company has now scrapped its method of demanding payments from suppliers after heavy criticism. Photograph: Graham Turner for the Guardian
A selection products owned by Premier Foods. The company has now scrapped its method of demanding payments from suppliers after heavy criticism. Photograph: Graham Turner for the Guardian

Premier Foods to reform system of demanding payments from suppliers

This article is more than 9 years old
Food company faced criticism from government and industry over its terms on now scrapped pay-to-stay scheme

Premier Foods has promised to reconsider its controversial scheme to obtain investment payments in return for contracts from suppliers.

The move came just 48 hours after the business secretary Vince Cable asked the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to investigate the kind of “pay-to-stay” arrangements being used by Premier.

The food company, which makes Mr Kipling cakes and Ambrosia custard, said it had cut the number of suppliers from 2,800 to 1,230 over the past 18 months and added that many of those remaining chose to make payments.

“Over the last few days it has become apparent that this mechanism has been widely misunderstood and misinterpreted,” said Gavin Darby, chief executive of Premier. “In this situation, we are fully prepared to simplify the details of our future programme to a more conventional type of discount negotiation, potentially based on price, value or volume-based rebates, or lump sums.”

Vince Cable, the business secretary, had accused the company of “demanding money with menace” while the Federation of Small Businesses said demanding a cash payment under the threat of delisting was “downright unfair”.

The company’s share price had been hit by the furore, which erupted after a new letter signed by Darby to suppliers emerged in the middle of last month asking them “to make an investment payment to support our growth”.

This was described by one supplier as blackmail and was interpreted more widely as a so-called pay-to-stay scheme under which companies that refused to cough up cash would be delisted as a supplier.

Premier, which also makes Bisto gravy and Sharwood sauces, said many suppliers had been happy to provide cash for investments because it helped Premier and the suppliers themselves to grow.

Darby still insisted there was nothing particularly unusual about the now scrapped scheme: “Most companies look for value from their suppliers and will commonly negotiate discounts or lump sums wherever they can which will be offered and accepted by suppliers if they believe their business will benefit. This is standard business practice. The investment payments we have requested from our suppliers are effectively just one form of discount of which there are many different types.”

Last Friday Premier published a list of supply companies which supported what the group was doing. They included Allied Protek Engineering, a medium-sized engineering, design and management company based in Grimsby, which gave a statement saying: “We were invited to join Premier Foods Investing for Growth Programme in 2013. Since making a small investment, Premier has not only awarded us more business direct, but has actively promoted our services to overseas based equipment manufacturers who have engaged us to install their equipment on a number of Premier Foods’ sites.”

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed